United States v. Union Pacific Railroad
This text of 234 U.S. 495 (United States v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The eleven carriers who are appellees on this record filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission applications to be relieved from the long and short-haul clause of § 4 of the Act to Regulate Commerce, as amended by the act of June 18, 1910, c. 309, 36 Stat. 539, 547. After full hearing the Commission entered an order granting in certain respects the relief prayed but establishing a proportionate relation to be maintained between the lower rate for the longer haul and the higher rate for the shorter haul upon the basis of percentages which were fixed with reference-to defined zones. The carriers refused to obey the order and filed their bill in the Commerce Court to enjoin its enforcement. An interlocutory injunction was ordered. The defendants moved to dismiss and on the overruling of the motions appealed from the interlocutory order, that case being No. 137. Subsequently upon the election of the defendants not to plead further, a final decree was entered and appealed from, that appeal being No. 163.
These cases are governed by the opinion in Nos. 136 *497 and 162 just decided. They were tried in the court below with the other cases, were decided by the same opinion, and, although different localities áre involved, the questions presented are identical, • and for the reasons given in the other cases, Nos. 136 and 162, the decree must be reversed and remanded to-the proper District Court with directions to dismiss the bill for want of equity.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 U.S. 495, 34 S. Ct. 995, 58 L. Ed. 1426, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-union-pacific-railroad-scotus-1914.