United States v. Unger

28 F. Cas. 332, 18 Int. Rev. Rec. 164

This text of 28 F. Cas. 332 (United States v. Unger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Unger, 28 F. Cas. 332, 18 Int. Rev. Rec. 164 (circtndny 1873).

Opinion

SHIPMAN, District Judge.

Duty is properly exacted on “abandoned” goods,—that is, on goods never withdrawn from warehouse for any purpose, but left at the disposal of the government, and permitted to be sold. The ten per centum additional duty imposed by act of March 14, 1866 [14 Stat. 8], upon goods withdrawn from warehouse after one year from date of importation, is also to be assessed upon goods never withdrawn, but sold to satisfy duties, and such amount is to be deducted from proceeds of sale in addition to the regular duties. It is clearly the intention [333]*333and meaning of the -warehouse acts that the government should receive the same duties on goods abandoned and sold to satisfy duties that it -would have received if the same goods had been withdrawn for consumption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. Cas. 332, 18 Int. Rev. Rec. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-unger-circtndny-1873.