United States v. Ulualoaiga Emelio, United States of America v. Angela Baracco

969 F.2d 849, 92 Daily Journal DAR 10554, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6605, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17359
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 30, 1992·No. 90-30370·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

969 F.2d 849

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ulualoaiga EMELIO, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Angela BARACCO, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 90-30370, 90-30373.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 30, 1992.

Prior report: 9th Cir., 956 F.2d 894.

Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

The district court is ordered on remand to determine Baracco's acceptance of responsibility in light of all the relevant factors. The district court is also ordered on remand to make a finding as to whether or not Emelio could reasonably have foreseen the distribution of the drugs that were distributed after his withdrawal from the conspiracy. United States v. Turner, 898 F.2d 705 (9th Cir.1990). The Defendants' petitions for rehearing are otherwise DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ulualoaiga Emelio, United States of America v. Angela Baracco, 969 F.2d 849, 92 Daily Journal DAR 10554, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6605, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17359 (9th Cir. 1992).

969 F.2d 849 (United States v. Ulualoaiga Emelio, United States of America v. Angela Baracco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mirna Valenzuela
495 F. App'x 817 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Kathy Evelyn Willis
38 F.3d 170 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
State v. Riker
869 P.2d 43 (Washington Supreme Court, 1994)
United States v. Angela Baracco
15 F.3d 1090 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)