United States v. Ulualoaiga Emelio, United States of America v. Angela Baracco
This text of 969 F.2d 849 (United States v. Ulualoaiga Emelio, United States of America v. Angela Baracco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
969 F.2d 849
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ulualoaiga EMELIO, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Angela BARACCO, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 90-30370, 90-30373.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 30, 1992.
Prior report: 9th Cir., 956 F.2d 894.
Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
The district court is ordered on remand to determine Baracco's acceptance of responsibility in light of all the relevant factors. The district court is also ordered on remand to make a finding as to whether or not Emelio could reasonably have foreseen the distribution of the drugs that were distributed after his withdrawal from the conspiracy. United States v. Turner, 898 F.2d 705 (9th Cir.1990). The Defendants' petitions for rehearing are otherwise DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
969 F.2d 849, 92 Daily Journal DAR 10554, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6605, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ulualoaiga-emelio-united-states-of-america-v-angela-ca9-1992.