United States v. Ulices Cruz-Perez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2016·No. 16-40091·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 16-40091 Document: 00513722061 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40091 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 18, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ULICES CRUZ-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15-CR-356-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ulices Cruz-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-40091 Document: 00513722061 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016

No. 16-40091

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ulices Cruz-Perez, (5th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Ulices Cruz-Perez (United States v. Ulices Cruz-Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)