United States v. Tyson

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Tyson

70 M.J. 94, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 350

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedApril 27, 2011

DocketNo. 11-0368/AR

StatusPublished

This text of 70 M.J. 94 (United States v. Tyson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Tyson, 70 M.J. 94, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 350 (Ark. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

CCA 20100093. Review granted on the following issue:

[95]*95WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20100093. Review granted on the following issue:

[95]*95WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 M.J. 94, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tyson-armfor-2011.