United States v. Tyrone Wallace
This text of United States v. Tyrone Wallace (United States v. Tyrone Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-3398 ___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Tyrone Wallace
Defendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________
Submitted: April 29, 2025 Filed: May 2, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Tyrone Wallace appeals the district court’s 1 decision to return him to civil commitment following a conditional discharge. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(f). His
1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the counsel, who seeks permission to withdraw, suggests the evidence was insufficient for recommitment.
We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Thomas, 949 F.3d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing factual findings in civil-commitment proceedings for clear error). Testimony at the revocation hearing established that less than a year after Wallace’s release, he assaulted his sister and went missing. See United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 677 (8th Cir. 2002) (emphasizing the “special deference” we give to “credibility determinations” (citation omitted)). In other words, as the district court found, he had not “compl[ied] with his prescribed regimen of medical, psychiatric, or psychological care or treatment,” which “create[d] a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person.” See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(f); United States v. Franklin, 435 F.3d 885, 889 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that revocation is justified when “a violation of the conditions of release . . . flows from the person’s mental disease and demonstrates that continued release presents a danger to the community”). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission to withdraw. ______________________________
Honorable Willie J. Epps, Jr., Chief United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Tyrone Wallace, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tyrone-wallace-ca8-2025.