United States v. Tyrone Christian

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Tyrone Christian. Read the opinion of the Court — 925 F.3d 305
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2018·No. 17-1799·Published

Opinion

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0203p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │ > No. 17-1799 v. │ │ │ TYRONE DEXTER CHRISTIAN, │ Defendant-Appellant. │ ┘

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids. No. 1:15-cr-00172-1—Robert J. Jonker, Chief District Judge.

Decided and Filed: September 17, 2018

Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, SUTTON, COOK, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges. _________________

ORDER _________________

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. No. 17-1799 United States v. Christian Page 2

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tyrone Christian, (6th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Tyrone Christian (United States v. Tyrone Christian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.