United States v. Tyren Cervenak

110 F.4th 1296
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 9, 2024·No. 23-3466·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0171p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │ > No. 23-3466 v. │ │ │ TYREN L. CERVENAK, │ Defendant-Appellant. │ ┘

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland. No. 1:22-cr-00204-1—John R. Adams, District Judge.

Decided and Filed: August 9, 2024

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER, MURPHY, DAVIS, MATHIS, and BLOOMEKATZ, Circuit Judges. _________________

COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Catherine Adinaro Shusky, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. ON RESPONSE: Jason Manion, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. _________________

ORDER _________________

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

A decision to grant rehearing en banc vacates the previous opinion and judgment of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case on the docket as a pending appeal. No. 23-3466 United States v. Cervenak Page 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

____________________________________ Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tyren Cervenak, 110 F.4th 1296 (6th Cir. 2024).

110 F.4th 1296 (United States v. Tyren Cervenak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tyren Cervenak
135 F.4th 311 (Sixth Circuit, 2025)