United States v. Tyler

358 F. App'x 430
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Tyler. Read the opinion of the Court — 301 F. App'x 265
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 29, 2009·No. No. 09-7581·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Vincent Tyler seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for an extension of time in which to file a response to Tyler’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion, and denying Tyler’s petition for judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. [431]*431R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Tyler seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tyler, 358 F. App'x 430 (4th Cir. 2009).

358 F. App'x 430 (United States v. Tyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)