United States v. Two Revolvers & One Shotgun
This text of 313 F. Supp. 216 (United States v. Two Revolvers & One Shotgun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Defendant, through claimant, has moved for Summary Judgment on the ground that the firearms were not subject to seizure under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) in that claimant was not a felon within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1202(a) (1) Appendix.1
Claimant pleaded guilty in the State of Tennessee to the crime of petit larceny, punishable by not less than (1) year nor more than (5) years. Claimant pleaded guilty on the assurance that the plea would result in reducing the crime to a misdemeanor2 and would avoid serving time in the state penitentiary. In fact a jury was impaneled3 and recommended that in view of the guilty plea claimant be found guilty of a misdemeanor and sentenced to the county workhouse to a confinement of eleven months and twenty-nine days.4 Claimant served this term.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1202(c) (2) Appendix, felony has been defined as follows:
“ ‘felony’ means any offense punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, but does not include any offense (other than one involving a firearm or explosive) classified as a misdemeanor under the laws of a State and punishable by a term of imprisonment of two years or less
Thus if claimant was subject to a term of imprisonment for a term of two years or less he would be a misdemeanant by Federal standards. However, the Tennessee misdemeanor statute5 simply separates felonies and misdemeanors by the place of imprisonment or the death penalty. For the potential length of sentence one must turn to the substantive Tennessee statute, in this case, Petit Larceny, containing a five year maximum.
Because of the five year maximum claimant was clearly a felon by Federal standards and the two revolvers and one shotgun were properly seized. Defendant's motion for Summary Judgment will be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 F. Supp. 216, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-two-revolvers-one-shotgun-wawd-1970.