United States v. Two Hundred Bushels of Corn

28 F. Cas. 314, 9 Ben. 186
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1877
StatusPublished

This text of 28 F. Cas. 314 (United States v. Two Hundred Bushels of Corn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Two Hundred Bushels of Corn, 28 F. Cas. 314, 9 Ben. 186 (E.D.N.Y. 1877).

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

The claimant’s motion for a bill of particulars must be granted. Under an information so vague as this it would be impossible to make due preparation for trial. He is entitled to such a description of the spirits referred to in the second count as will enable him to identify the spirits on which it is claimed the tax was not paid. He is also entitled to be informed as to what entries in his books it is intended to show he should have made and has not done so under the third count. This information should be sufficiently definite to enable the claimant to know what materials and what grain it is charged that he did not enter, and by date, quantity, or other description informed what spirits distilled have not been entered at all, and what entry of material made or spirits it is intended to show has been omitted. He is also entitled to be informed as to what entries in his books it is intended to show are false.

The order must be that the district attorney, within forty days from this time, furnish a bill of the above-named particulars to the claimant in this action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. Cas. 314, 9 Ben. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-two-hundred-bushels-of-corn-nyed-1877.