United States v. Twinam

73 M.J. 465, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 878
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedAugust 25, 2014
DocketNo. 14-0619/AR
StatusPublished

This text of 73 M.J. 465 (United States v. Twinam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Twinam, 73 M.J. 465, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 878 (Ark. 2014).

Opinion

CCA 20120884. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY ACCEPTING APPELLANT’S PLEA WHEN HE IGNORED THE ULTIMATE OFFENSE DOCTRINE AND FOUND APPELLANT GUILTY OF FAILURE TO OBEY AN ORDER OR REGULATION.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 M.J. 465, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-twinam-armfor-2014.