United States v. Tuua
This text of 68 F. App'x 49 (United States v. Tuua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Theresa Tuua appeals her conviction by guilty plea and her sentence of one year of incarceration plus six years of supervised release for distribution of cocaine base within 1000 feet of a playground, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 860(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Tuua’s counsel has submitted a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review. Appellant has not filed a supplemental pro se brief.
Our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 F. App'x 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tuua-ca9-2003.