United States v. Turner

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Turner

222 F. 891, 138 C.C.A. 371, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1508

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 25, 1915

DocketNo. 4262

StatusPublished

This text of 222 F. 891 (United States v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Turner, 222 F. 891, 138 C.C.A. 371, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1508 (8th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

GARLAND, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by the United States to cancel for fraud two certain land patents, issued August 10, 1906, and April 7, 1910, to Owen F. Turner and Samuel J. K. Hayhurst, respectively. The alleged fraud consisted in alleged false testimony as to residence and cultivation by Turner and Hayhurst and their witness[892]*892es. The action is brought against Turner, as the legal title to the land, except that portion thereof which Turner conveyed to Millard, has become vested in Turner. The trial court found that the United States had not clearly shown that the patents were obtained by fraud or false testimony. A condensed statement of the evidence appears in the record.

The question to be decided is one of fact. To state a portion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose, and the whole thereof cannot be stated within the limits of an opinion. We have, however, read the evidence contained in the record, and after careful consideration have arrived at the conclusion that no serious error intervened in the consideration thereof by the trial court.

The judgment below should be affirmed; and it is so ordered..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GARLAND, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by the United States to cancel for fraud two certain land patents, issued August 10, 1906, and April 7, 1910, to Owen F. Turner and Samuel J. K. Hayhurst, respectively. The alleged fraud consisted in alleged false testimony as to residence and cultivation by Turner and Hayhurst and their witness[892]*892es. The action is brought against Turner, as the legal title to the land, except that portion thereof which Turner conveyed to Millard, has become vested in Turner. The trial court found that the United States had not clearly shown that the patents were obtained by fraud or false testimony. A condensed statement of the evidence appears in the record.

The question to be decided is one of fact. To state a portion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose, and the whole thereof cannot be stated within the limits of an opinion. We have, however, read the evidence contained in the record, and after careful consideration have arrived at the conclusion that no serious error intervened in the consideration thereof by the trial court.

The judgment below should be affirmed; and it is so ordered..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 F. 891, 138 C.C.A. 371, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-turner-ca8-1915.