United States v. Turner

402 F. App'x 747
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2010
Docket09-5220
StatusUnpublished

This text of 402 F. App'x 747 (United States v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Turner, 402 F. App'x 747 (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sherman Aan Turner pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2006). Based on his prior convictions for felony crimes of violence, Turner was sentenced pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2006), to 180 months of imprisonment. Turner appeals his sentence. Finding no error, we affirm.

Turner argues that his prior conviction for larceny from the person does not qualify as a violent felony under the ACCA. We have previously rejected a similar challenge, see United States v. Jarmon, 596 *748 F.3d 228, 230-33 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 145, 178 L.Ed.2d 87 (2010), and we disagree with Turner’s argument that Jarmon has been called into question by the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, -U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 1265, 176 L.Ed.2d 1 (2010). Therefore, we may not overrule this court’s binding precedent. United States v. Simms, 441 F.3d 313, 318 (4th Cir.2006) (“A decision of a panel of this court becomes the law of the circuit and is binding on other panels unless it is overruled by a subsequent en banc opinion of this court or a superseding contrary decision of the Supreme Court.” (internal quotation omitted)). Therefore, this claim fails.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James E. Simms
441 F.3d 313 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)
El Paso Corporation v. United States
748 F.3d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Johnson v. United States
176 L. Ed. 2d 1 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 F. App'x 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-turner-ca4-2010.