United States v. Turley
This text of 28 F. Cas. 230 (United States v. Turley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(nem. con.) arrested the judgment on the second count because the Penitentiary Act only punishes assault and battery with intent to kill, and this count is for assault only.
The Court, also, was of opinion that the objection for want of the name of a prosecutor was too late after verdict; but agreed to hear Mr. Hewitt again, upon that point, in H. Lloyd’s Cases, (post.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 F. Cas. 230, 4 D.C. 334, 4 Cranch 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-turley-circtddc-1833.