United States v. Tunstall
71 M.J. 379, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 921
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedAugust 8, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0516/AF
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 71 M.J. 379 (United States v. Tunstall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Tunstall, 71 M.J. 379, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 921 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 37592. Review granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER APPELLANT’S CONVICTION FOR INDECENT ACTS MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN INSTRUCTING THE JURY THAT INDECENT ACTS IS A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT.
II. WHETHER THE FINDING OF GUILTY TO ADULTERY MUST BE DISMISSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 907(b)(1) BECAUSE IT FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Tunstall
72 M.J. 191 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 379, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tunstall-armfor-2012.