United States v. Tucker

172 F. App'x 83
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2006·No. No. 05-60188·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Eric Tucker pleaded guilty to accessory after the fact of armed robbery and was sentenced to serve 46 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Tucker now appeals his sentence. He contends that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines and that his sentence is contrary to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 [84] L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). These arguments are unavailing. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551 (5th Cir.2006); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005); United States v. Burton, 126 F.3d 666, 669, 679 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Harris, 104 F.3d 1465, 1474-75 (5th Cir.1997). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tucker, 172 F. App'x 83 (5th Cir. 2006).

172 F. App'x 83 (United States v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Harris
104 F.3d 1465 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Mares
402 F.3d 511 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Alonzo
435 F.3d 551 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)