United States v. Tucker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6346

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE MACK TUCKER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-339, CA-96-93-20-7)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Mack Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Beattie B. Ashmore, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tucker, Nos. CR-95-339; CA-96-93-20-7 (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. *

AFFIRMED

* Appellant has also filed a motion for production of sentencing transcripts. As these transcripts are already part of the record, we deny his motion as moot.