United States v. Truman Jones
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 20-2765 & 20-2766
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
TRUMAN JONES,
Appellant
(M.D. Pa. Nos. 3:16-cr-00127 & 3:19-cr-00160)
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Present SMITH, Chief Judge, and McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in the above-captioned case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED IN PART. A majority of the judges who partici- pated in the decision of the Court having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED. The opinion and judgment filed August 12, 2021, are hereby VACATED. A subsequent opinion and judgment are herewith issued. The majority has made changes to the language that appeared on page five.
A majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehear- ing, the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc is DENIED.
By the Court,
s/ Stephanos Bibas
Circuit Judge
Dated: September 10, 2021 Lmr/cc: All Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Truman Jones (United States v. Truman Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.