United States v. Truesdale

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 8, 2011
• Docket: 10-7329
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7329

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALVIN BERNARD TRUESDALE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-7479

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:92-cr-00034-MR-1)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Bernard Truesdale, Appellant Pro Se. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Alvin Bernard Truesdale appeals from the district

court’s orders (1) denying his motions for leave to file a

response to counsel’s statement of his noneligibility for a

sentence reduction, for a copy of his presentence report, to

appoint new counsel based on a conflict of interest, and for

judicial notice, and (2) granting his attorney’s motion to

withdraw as counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Truesdale’s motion for

appointment of counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Truesdale, No. 3:92-cr-

00034-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 7 & 27, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED