United States v. Trubow

196 F.2d 161, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2427
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1952
Docket12955_1
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 196 F.2d 161 (United States v. Trubow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Trubow, 196 F.2d 161, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2427 (9th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been regularly submitted to this court for decision, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that the judgment heretofore entered in the case be and is hereby declared to be vacated and set aside, and the case be and is remanded to the district court with instructions to make a finding upon the issue of 'contributory negligence; and further to make specific findings of fact in place of and instead of the findings of fact by reference to paragraphs of the complaint as appear in the record.

While we deem the allegations sufficient under Rule 8(a) of the' Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 28 U.S.C.A., as a statement of a claim, we deem them lacking in a desired certainty and. definiteness as findings of fac-t upon which to base a judgment. 1

Reversed and remanded.

1

. Dor an instance of lack of certainty and definiteness in the use of the allegations as findings of fact, paragraph IX of the complaint reads as follows: “Plaintiff is informed and believes and therefore alleges that the injuries so sustained are permanent in nature.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 F.2d 161, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-trubow-ca9-1952.