United States v. Trevor Ray

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-1377 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Trevor Scott Ray

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City ____________

Submitted: December 23, 2019 Filed: December 30, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before STRAS, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Trevor Ray appeals the district court1 order denying his motion for a new trial and denying his requests for copies of documents. Our review of the record satisfies

1 The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial. See United States v. Grover, 511 F.3d 779, 783 (8th Cir. 2007) (denial of motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion). We also find no basis for reversal of the district court’s ruling on Ray’s requests for documents. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-