United States v. Trevor Grant, A/K/A Roy Arrindell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Trevor Grant, A/K/A Roy Arrindell

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23184, 1995 WL 375878

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 26, 1995

Docket95-6275

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 168 (United States v. Trevor Grant, A/K/A Roy Arrindell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Trevor Grant, A/K/A Roy Arrindell, 59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23184, 1995 WL 375878 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Trevor GRANT, a/k/a Roy Arrindell, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6275.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.

Trevor Grant, appellant pro se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Grant, Nos. CR-92-159; CA-95-46-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Trevor GRANT, a/k/a Roy Arrindell, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6275.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.

Trevor Grant, appellant pro se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Grant, Nos. CR-92-159; CA-95-46-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23184, 1995 WL 375878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-trevor-grant-aka-roy-arrindell-ca4-1995.