United States v. Trevino
Opinion
Case: 22-40600 Document: 00516689343 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 27, 2023 No. 22-40600 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Armando Trevino,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:22-CR-157-1 ______________________________
Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Trevino has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-40600 Document: 00516689343 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2023
No. 22-40600
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Trevino (United States v. Trevino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.