United States v. Trevino

209 F. App'x 431
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Trevino. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 F. App'x 319
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 12, 2006·No. 05-10695·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Ray Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Trevino has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no non- *432 frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Trevino, 209 F. App'x 431 (5th Cir. 2006).

209 F. App'x 431 (United States v. Trevino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)