United States v. Trevino

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 20, 1999·No. 99-10088·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10088 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROEL TREVINO, also known as Roy Trevino,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-197-ALL - - - - - - - - - -

October 19, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Roel Trevino has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the

brief, Trevino’s response, and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Trevino, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Trevino (United States v. Trevino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)