United States v. Trevino

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Trevino

699 F. App'x 920

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 31, 2017·No. No. 17-11228 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Madden, III, appointed counsel for Miguel Trevino in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Trevino’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Madden, III, appointed counsel for Miguel Trevino in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Trevino’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Trevino, 699 F. App'x 920 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 920 (United States v. Trevino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related