United States v. Trent Brewer

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Trent Brewer. Read the opinion of the Court — 699 F. App'x 318
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2018·No. 17-41173·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 17-41173 Document: 00514494283 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals

No. 17-41173 Fifth Circuit

FILED May 31, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

TRENT BREWER,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 4:07-CR-246-12

Before SMITH, HAYNES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Trent Brewer, federal prisoner #24313-077, who pleaded guilty of

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-41173 Document: 00514494283 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2018

No. 17-41173

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, moves for the appoint- ment of counsel. He purports to have filed a second direct appeal seeking to challenge his career-offender sentencing enhancement.

An indigent defendant in a felony case must be provided counsel on direct appeal as of right. United States v. Palomo, 80 F.3d 138, 141 (5th Cir. 1996); 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(1)(A), (c). Brewer, however, already has filed a direct appeal of his conviction and initial sentence. See United States v. Brewer, 344 F. App’x 947 (5th Cir. 2009). A defendant “is not entitled to two appeals,” and a second appeal from the same conviction is “not properly before this Court.” United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1296−97 (5th Cir. 1978); accord United States v. Rodriguez, 821 F.3d 632, 633 (5th Cir. 2016). A defendant is entitled to the appointment of counsel only for his first direct appeal. See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987).

The motion is DENIED. Because the second appeal is not properly before this court, it is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Trent Brewer, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Trent Brewer (United States v. Trent Brewer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Palomo
80 F.3d 138 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Brewer
344 F. App'x 947 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Pennsylvania v. Finley
481 U.S. 551 (Supreme Court, 1987)
United States v. Edward J. Arlt, III
567 F.2d 1295 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. David Rodriguez
821 F.3d 632 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)