United States v. Tremaine Moore
This text of 385 F. App'x 619 (United States v. Tremaine Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Tremaine Moore appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Moore contends that the district court abused its discretion by revoking his supervised release. The record reflects that the district court’s determination that Moore violated his supervised release by possessing a firearm is supported by a *620 preponderance of the evidence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); see also United States v. Daniel, 209 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
385 F. App'x 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tremaine-moore-ca9-2010.