United States v. Tremaine Moore

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Tremaine Moore

385 F. App'x 619

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2010·No. 09-10338·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Tremaine Moore appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Moore contends that the district court abused its discretion by revoking his supervised release. The record reflects that the district court’s determination that Moore violated his supervised release by possessing a firearm is supported by a *620 preponderance of the evidence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); see also United States v. Daniel, 209 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM **

Tremaine Moore appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Moore contends that the district court abused its discretion by revoking his supervised release. The record reflects that the district court’s determination that Moore violated his supervised release by possessing a firearm is supported by a *620 preponderance of the evidence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); see also United States v. Daniel, 209 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

United States v. Tremaine Moore, 385 F. App'x 619 (9th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

385 F. App'x 619 (United States v. Tremaine Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related