United States v. Travis Elmer Rushing
456 F.2d 1294
Opinion
On this direct appeal, a review of the record indicates that the district court failed to comply with Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, in that no inquiry was made of defendant to determine whether there was a factual basis for the plea of guilty. The failure of the court below to comply with Rule 11 constituted reversible error entitling the defendant to plead anew. See McCarthy v. United States, 1969, 394 U.S. 459, 89 S.Ct. 1166, 22 L.Ed.2d 418.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Travis Elmer Rushing, 456 F.2d 1294 (5th Cir. 1972).
456 F.2d 1294 (United States v. Travis Elmer Rushing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Allen
267 So. 2d 544 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)