United States v. Trapp
This text of 76 F. App'x 147 (United States v. Trapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Steven Trapp appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to failure to surrender for service of sentence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146. Trapp contends that the case should be remanded because the district court may not have been aware of its authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3584 to impose a concurrent rather than consecutive sentence. The premise of Trapp’s contention is incorrect. The district court was required to impose a consecutive sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3146(b)(2).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 F. App'x 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-trapp-ca9-2003.