United States v. Town-Maker

28 F. Cas. 201

This text of 28 F. Cas. 201 (United States v. Town-Maker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States District Court for the District of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Town-Maker, 28 F. Cas. 201 (ard 1836).

Opinion

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

It is considered by' the court that the indictment in this case, and the matters and things therein contained, are not sufficient in law for the plaintiffs to have and maintain this prosecution against the defendant, nor is he bound by the laws of the land to answer thereto; and therefore said defendant by his counsel moved for his discharge from custody, which motion was opposed by Samuel C. Roane, district attorney of the United States, on the ground that he was ready to produce evidence before the court that the defendant had committed the crime of murder. And thereupon the court overruled the motion of the defendant for his discharge from custody, and the district attorney introduced a witness, who proved that the defendant had been guilty of the homicide of a citizen of the United States, in the district of country occupied by the Osage Nation of Indians, and therefore, upon motion of the district attorney, it was ordered by the court that the defendant be remanded to the custody of the marshal, to be imprisoned until he shall be discharged according to law.

YELL, J., dissented from this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. Cas. 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-town-maker-ard-1836.