United States v. Torres-Torres
This text of 329 F. App'x 747 (United States v. Torres-Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Artemio Torres-Torres appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Torres-Torres contends that the district court erroneously applied a 16-level enhancement based upon an “old” prior conviction that should not have been scored for purposes of criminal history, and failed to properly apply the § 3553(a) sentencing factors. The sentence imposed is substantively reasonable and procedurally sound. Cf. United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050, 1054-1058 (9th Cir.2009); see also Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596-97, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
Torres-Torres’ contention that using the same prior conviction for the sentencing enhancement and for calculating his criminal history score constitutes impermissible double counting is foreclosed. See United States v. Garcia-Cardenas, 555 F.3d 1049, 1050 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).
We remand to the district court with directions to delete from the judgment of conviction the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-torres-torres-ca9-2009.