United States v. Torres-Martinez
This text of 295 F. App'x 232 (United States v. Torres-Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Manuel Torres-Martinez appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(a)(1), (b)(2)(G), and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Torres-Martinez contends that the district court erred at sentencing by: (1) failing to consider and discuss the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); (2) placing undue weight on the advisory Guidelines range; and (3) considering the fact that he did not plead guilty pursuant to a plea agreement. Torres-Martinez further contends that his sentence is unreasonable. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that Torres-Martinez’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468-69, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 994-96 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc); see also United States v. ReinaRodriguez, 468 F.3d 1147, 1158-59 (9th Cir.2006), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Grisel, 488 F.3d 844, 851 n. 5 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-torres-martinez-ca9-2008.