United States v. Torres

225 F. App'x 245
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 F. App'x 361
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2007·No. 06-20015·Unpublished

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

This court previously affirmed the conviction and sentence of the Appellant, Jose Victor Torres (“Torres”). United States v. Torres, 202 Fed.Appx. 883 (5th Cir.2006). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded the case for reconsideration in the light of Lopez v. Gonzales, — U.S.—, 127 S.Ct. 625,166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006). Ochoar-Perez v. United States, — U.S.—, 127 S.Ct. 1263, 167 L.Ed.2d 66 (2007). Following the Supreme Court’s remand, we requested and received supplemental letter briefs from both parties with respect to the impact of Lopez.

The Government concedes, and we agree that, in the light of Lopez, the district court erred by enhancing Torres’s sentence on the basis of his Texas convictions for possession of methamphetamine and for possession of heroin. Torres remains in custody in federal prison, with a projected release date of June 4, 2007. Accordingly, the appeal is not moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381 (5th Cir.2007).

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM Torres’s conviction, VACATE his sentence, and REMAND for resentencing in accordance with Lopez.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Torres, 225 F. App'x 245 (5th Cir. 2007).

225 F. App'x 245 (United States v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis
483 F.3d 381 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Lopez v. Gonzales
549 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Pennington v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
202 F. App'x 880 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)