United States v. Torres
Opinion
PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 92-5246
MADELYN TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-30-G)
Argued: January 30, 1996
Decided: March 4, 1996
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
_________________________________________________________________
Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.
_________________________________________________________________
COUNSEL
ARGUED: John Randolph Riley, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________ OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an evenly-divided vote of the en banc court.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Torres (United States v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.