United States v. Torres

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 F.3d 91
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 1996·No. 92-5246·Published

Opinion

PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 92-5246

MADELYN TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-30-G)

Argued: January 30, 1996

Decided: March 4, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

ARGUED: John Randolph Riley, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an evenly-divided vote of the en banc court.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Torres, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Torres (United States v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.