United States v. Torres

107 F.3d 1, 1997 WL 56860
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 162 F.3d 6
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided February 12, 1997·No. 96-1920·Unpublished

Opinion

107 F.3d 1

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Yusuf TORRES, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 96-1920.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1997.

Janet H. Pumphrey on brief for appellant.

Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Jean B. Weld, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, CYR, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his sentence on the sole ground that the district court erred "in failing to consider a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 because the 100-to-1 penalty for crack and powder cocaine violates the equal protection clause." He specifically argues that, when Congress disapproved the Sentencing Commission's proposal to equalize those penalties, it violated equal protection. However, we already have rejected the substance of that argument. See United States v. Andrade, 94 F.3d 9, 14-15 (1st Cir.1996); United States v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733, 739-41 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 647 (1994). Defendant presents no discernible reason to diverge from that precedent.

The sentence is affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Torres, 107 F.3d 1, 1997 WL 56860 (1st Cir. 1997).

107 F.3d 1 (United States v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Andrade
94 F.3d 9 (First Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Daryl E. Singleterry
29 F.3d 733 (First Circuit, 1994)