United States v. Tooker
This text of United States v. Tooker (United States v. Tooker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 24-60004 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 24-60004 FILED August 19, 2024 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Gerald Joseph Tooker,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:23-CR-10-1 ______________________________
Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Gerald Joseph Tooker pleaded guilty to escaping the custody of a federal institution. He was sentenced above the guidelines range to 24 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Tooker argues on appeal that the district court exhibited a clear error of judgment
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-60004 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/19/2024
No. 24-60004
when balancing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence. We review for abuse of discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). An above-guidelines sentence is substantively unreasonable if it “(1) does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors.” United States v. Diehl, 775 F.3d 714, 724 (5th Cir. 2015). Based on our review of the record, and in light of our deferential standard of review, we are not persuaded that the district court abused its discretion. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; Diehl, 775 F.3d at 724. AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Tooker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tooker-ca5-2024.