United States v. Tooker

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2024·No. 24-60004·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-60004 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 24-60004

FILED

August 19, 2024

Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Gerald Joseph Tooker,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:23-CR-10-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Gerald Joseph Tooker pleaded guilty to escaping the custody of a federal institution. He was sentenced above the guidelines range to 24 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Tooker argues on appeal that the district court exhibited a clear error of judgment

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-60004 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/19/2024

No. 24-60004

when balancing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence.

We review for abuse of discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S.

38, 51 (2007). An above-guidelines sentence is substantively unreasonable if it “(1) does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors.” United States v. Diehl, 775 F.3d 714, 724 (5th Cir. 2015). Based on our review of the record, and in light of our deferential standard of review, we are not persuaded that the district court abused its discretion. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; Diehl, 775 F.3d at 724.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tooker, (5th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Tooker (United States v. Tooker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gall v. United States
552 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. David Diehl
775 F.3d 714 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)