United States v. Tony Efrem Turnage

966 F.2d 1446, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22169, 1992 WL 132517
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1992·No. 92-6398·Unpublished

Opinion

966 F.2d 1446

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Tony Efrem TURNAGE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6398.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-87-437-S, CR-87-439-S, CA-92-584-S)

Tony Efrem Turnage, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael M. Middleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Tony Efrem Turnage appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Turnage, Nos. CR-87-437-S, CR-87-439-S, CA-92-584-S (D. Md. Mar. 17 & Mar. 31, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tony Efrem Turnage, 966 F.2d 1446, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22169, 1992 WL 132517 (4th Cir. 1992).

966 F.2d 1446 (United States v. Tony Efrem Turnage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related