United States v. Tony Alexander

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Tony Alexander. Read the opinion of the Court — 661 F. App'x 786
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2016·No. 16-6239·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6239

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY BERNARD ALEXANDER, a/k/a Sealed Dft #1,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1)

Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tony Bernard Alexander appeals from the district court’s

orders denying his motion for early termination of his supervised

release and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-

00178-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2016 & Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tony Alexander, (4th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Tony Alexander (United States v. Tony Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.