United States v. Tong Nguyen
This text of 144 F. App'x 576 (United States v. Tong Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tong Thanh Robert Nguyen pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and the district court * sentenced him to 135 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, Nguyen argues the district court should have departed downward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 because the seriousness of his criminal history was overstated, and he should be resentenced under United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the district court treated the Guidelines as mandatory at his pre-Booker sentencing.
As to the first issue, Nguyen cannot challenge his 135-month prison sentence because he specifically agreed to it in his plea agreement. See United States v. Reyes-Contreras, 349 F.3d 524, 525 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam); United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995). As to the second issue, Nguyen did not raise a Sixth Amendment objection below, and he cannot demonstrate a reasonable probability the district court would have imposed a lower sentence under advisory Guidelines. See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 552-53 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc), petition for cert. filed, — U.S.L.W. - (U.S. July 27, 2005) (No. 05-5547).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 F. App'x 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tong-nguyen-ca8-2005.