United States v. Tondrell Gary, Jr.

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1971

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Tondrell Darnez Gary, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Waterloo

____________

Submitted: December 9, 2019 Filed: December 12, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Tondrell Gary appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw,

1 The Honorable C. J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (sentences are reviewed for substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse of discretion standard; abuse of discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors). The record establishes that the district court adequately considered the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Wohlman, 651 F.3d 878, 887 (8th Cir. 2011) (court need not mechanically recite § 3553(a) factors, so long as it is clear from record that court actually considered them in determining sentence).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________