United States v. Tondreau

669 F. App'x 528
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 27, 2016
DocketNo. 15-11484 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 528 (United States v. Tondreau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tondreau, 669 F. App'x 528 (11th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marie Lucie Tondreau appeals her convictions and sentences for one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and four counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1342 and 1343. Regarding her conviction, Tondreau argues that the district court erred in denying her motions for judgment of acquittal and that the district [529]*529court committed cumulative evidentiary errors, warranting reversal. As to her sentence, Tondreau contends that the district court erred in imposing a two-level mass-marketing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(2)(A)(ii) and erred in declining to apply a two-point downward adjustment under § 3B1.2 for a minor role in the offense. After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attempt and conspiracy
18 U.S.C. § 1349
§ 1343
18 U.S.C. § 1343

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tondreau-ca11-2016.