United States v. Tommy Nelson, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 2018
Docket17-11214
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Tommy Nelson, Jr. (United States v. Tommy Nelson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tommy Nelson, Jr., (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 17-11214 Document: 00514475434 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/16/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 17-11214 May 16, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TOMMY NELSON, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-48-1

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tommy Nelson, Jr., appeals the 105-month sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to bank robbery. He argues that the district court erred in imposing a seven-level enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(A), for the discharge of a firearm during the commission of the robbery. Specifically, Nelson asserts that the enhancement does not apply because he did not willfully induce the discharge of the firearm.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-11214 Document: 00514475434 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/16/2018

No. 17-11214

As he concedes, Nelson’s argument is foreclosed by United States v. Roberts, 203 F.3d 867, 870-71 (5th Cir. 2000), in which this court held, on similar facts, that a § 2B3.1(b)(2)(A) enhancement was proper where the defendant aided in trying to wrest control of a firearm away from a deputy. This court concluded that the defendant’s actions induced the deputy to discharge the weapon. Roberts, 203 F.3d at 870. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Roberts
203 F.3d 867 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Tommy Nelson, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tommy-nelson-jr-ca5-2018.