United States v. Tommie Thomas
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6183
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TOMMIE RAYMOND THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00173-GCM-1)
Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommie Raymond Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tommie Raymond Thomas appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to correct an alleged clerical error in his
criminal judgment. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. Because there is no
clerical error in Thomas’ criminal judgment, we affirm the district
court’s order. United States v. Thomas, No. 3:03-cr-00173-GCM-1
(W.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Tommie Thomas (United States v. Tommie Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.