United States v. Tomlin
This text of United States v. Tomlin (United States v. Tomlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7337
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KAREEM TOMLIN, a/k/a Kareem Abdul Tomblin, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge; Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (3:92-cr- 00238)
Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 4, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem Tomlin, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kareem Tomlin seeks to appeal his 1993 conviction and
sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of
appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P.
4(b)(1)(A). Tomlin filed his notice of appeal more than a decade
after the expiration of the appeal period. Because Tomlin failed
to file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Tomlin’s
motions for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Tomlin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tomlin-ca4-2007.