United States v. Tolentino-Tavera
This text of 56 F. App'x 398 (United States v. Tolentino-Tavera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jaime Tolentino-Tavera challenges the district court’s use of Ninth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 9.2. We have previously approved the use of this instruction. United States v. Barajas-Mon-tiel, 185 F.3d 947, 953-54 (9th Cir.1999). We have also held that actual transportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) is a general, not specific, intent crime. United States v. Ramirez-Martinez, 273 F.3d 903, 914 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, there was no error.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tolentino-tavera-ca9-2003.