United States v. Toledo
This text of United States v. Toledo (United States v. Toledo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-50618 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARTIN TOLEDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CR-44-25-FB --------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Martin Toledo has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Toledo has filed a response
requesting that counsel’s motion be granted and that new counsel
be appointed, as well as a motion for an extension of time to
file a brief.
Our review of the briefs and of the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-50618 -2-
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
Toledo’s request for appointment of new counsel is DENIED as
moot, and his motion for an extension of time to file a brief is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Toledo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-toledo-ca5-2003.