United States v. Todman
This text of 134 F. App'x 196 (United States v. Todman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
John Dennis Todman appeals the revocation of his probation and the sentence of time-served followed by 36 months of supervised release imposed upon the revocation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Following our order of December 1, 2004, Todman’s counsel has submitted a renewed motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), together with a supplemental brief stating that she has found no meritorious issues for review. Appellant did not file a supplemental pro se brief, and the government did not file a brief.
Our consideration of counsel’s brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 F. App'x 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-todman-ca9-2005.